"Bewick" (1825)

Bewick?, dance of death
1824: Portfolio introduces a series of cuts by "Mr. Bewick".
Bewick?, Soldier
Death attacks the soldier with a large arrow instead of a bone.

The genuine John Bewick's woodcuts were destroyed by fire in 1803.

Nevertheless, 7th August 1824 the magazine "The Portfolio" featured an octagonal woodcut, which was a copy of the frontispiece created by John Bewick: Death leading all citizens out of town to the open grave (picture to the left). The woodcut was followed by this blurp: »WE have the pleasure of presenting our readers with three beautiful engravings by the first Wood Engraver that ever this Country produced — Bewick. We may venture to add, that our present Number will testify that expence is an object which is never regarded in supporting the character of the Portfolio, as the most attractive Periodical of the day«.

In the following issues, several of these octagonal woodcuts were featured, two and two. Above each pair of woodcuts was the title »The cuts by the celebrated Bewick«. At a first glance these woodcuts are so special that it's hard to tell whom they are supposed to copy, but when Death attacks the soldier with an arrow instead of a bone (picture to the right), we know it isn't a copy of Bewick, but rather of Birckmann, Hollar or Deuchar.

And verily: All the woodcuts that were brought were among those 30 dancers that Hollar had engraved. And under each picture was the same letter-press that had been used in the 1816-edition of Hollar.

After having produced copies of 28 of Hollar's 30 etchings (Death's Escutcheon and the soldier was still missing), the editor needed letter-press for the rest of the dance (i.e. those dancers not in the 1816-edition of Hollar). Since the letter-press for the 1816-edition of Hollar was taken from earlier editions of Deuchar (who in turn took them from Mechel), the logical step would have been to get hold of an edition of Deuchar to get the rest of the letter-press. But instead the editor chose to accompany all the following woodcuts with the stilted verses from the genuine Bewick's book.

Bewick?, Dance of death
The 1825 edition: Engravings on Wood by Mr. Bewick
Bewick?, Death's armour
When you don't bother to read the text you're stealing, the result can become rather bizarre. According to the caption for this picture of two skeletons, "the two figures […] represent the dress of the Swiss Nobility of the sixteenth century."

When then 50th woodcut was published 23rd October 1824, the magazine ended with an announcement: »Announcements. Charlton Wright Has just Published […] The celebrated Holbein's Dance of Death, with 52 spirited Engravings by the celebrated Bewick, beautifully printed« — and verily, in 1825 William Charlton Wright published »The Dance of Death of the celebrated Hans Holbein, in a Series of Fifty-two Engravings on Wood by Mr. Bewick« (pictures left and right).

The octagonal woodcuts are those from The Portfolio with the same mixture of stolen texts and stolen verses. Now Death's Escutcheon had been added and was adorned by a description from the 1816-edition of Hollar. This one description was written by Douce, and the result was rather bizarre (see picture to the right).

The title doesn't specify, which "Mr. Bewick" it refers to. John Bewick's woodcuts had perished back in 1803, and he had been dead for 30 years. It wasn't his famous brother, »the celebrated Bewick«, either. Thomas Bewick called the book a »barefaced falshood« in a letter: »PS, the Publisher of Holbein must be certain of my death or he would not openly put forth so barefaced a falshood as that of my having done any Cuts for the 'Dance of Death«.(1)

The woodcuts received an extremely favourable review in The Literary Magnet: »MR. WRIGHT has here presented us with the best edition we have yet seen of Holbein's Dance of Death. The work was much wanted; for the former ones were sadly imperfect; and the character of the wood-cuts, which alone lends popularity to the book, were defaced and worn down by the continual demands for them. Of Mr. Bewick, the artist of the present wood-engravings, we need say nothing ; his name is well known to the admirers of the Fine Arts; but let us add, — that if any thing is likely to give permanency to his well-earned reputation, it is the masterly way in which he has here illustrated Holbein's Dance of Death. The characters throughout may almost vie with those of Hogarth in vivid and startling reality, as any one who will refer to the engravings XXVIII. and XL. may perceive. Add to this, that the whole series form a fine moral tale of the mock-sublime nature; similar, and indeed in no respect inferior, to the celebrated Love-a-la-Mode of Hogarth. On the whole, we wish our publisher all the success that his spirited speculation merits.«

Bewick?, The Fool
" for purposes of caricature"

Notice that in the last sentence it says, "our publisher". Independent art experts were less impressed — in fact, the indignation over this edition spread all over the world:

Bewick?, Merchant
"absurdly modernized"

In England, Douce(2) doubted that the cuts were made by Bewick, »… the cuts, if Bewick's, [are] very inferior to those in his other works« and he called them »ridiculously modernised«; in Germany, Massmann(3) wrote »arg modernisirt«; and in France, Brunet(4) characterized them as »Copie médiocre et infidèle« and Langlois(5) added: »ridiculement modernisées et d'une exécution médiocre«. The American Warthin(6) summed it up: »The cuts with several exceptions are imitations of the original Holbein, but are absurdly modernized; both the costumes and the properties are represented in the contemporary style … [they] have somewhat the quality of caricature in them […] If these cuts are Bewick's, which Douce seems to doubt, they are far inferior to his other work, and executed in a different style. They represent a far departure from the old medieval conceptions and treatment, and betray the tendency of the early nineteenth century to use the Dance of Death motive for purposes of caricature«.

The woodcuts were also printed on broadsheets with the title »Printed from Original Woodcuts, Engraved by Thomas and John Bewick«. Curiously enough, a former owner has struck out the words "Thomas and" — as if it was more probable that the woodcuts were made by John, who had been dead for 30 years.

One must agree with the critics: The woodcuts are "for purposes of caricature" and "ridiculously modernised", and there's no way they were made by the brothers Bewick. But they are rather amusing, and a nice change of pace compared to John Bewick's more indifferent copies and the stilted text.

These woodcuts are one more example of works wrongly attributed to John Bewick.

External Links

Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Frontispiece
Frontispiece
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: The Pope
The Pope
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Bishop
Bishop
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Abbess
Abbess
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Old woman
Old woman
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Physician
Physician
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Merchant
Merchant
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Sailor
Sailor
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Noblewoman
Noblewoman
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Child
Child
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: The escutcheon
The escutcheon
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Soldier
Soldier
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Waggoner
Waggoner
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Gambler
Gambler
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Fool
Fool
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Young woman
Young woman
Pseudo-Bewick 1825: Young man
Young man

Other interpreters of Holbein's dance of death

Footnotes: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

The letter from Thomas Bewick is quoted from the book Bewick to Dovaston: Letters 1824-1828, page 47.
Francis Douce, »The Dance of Death Exhibited in Elegant Engravings on Wood with a dissertation on the several representations of that subject but more particularly on those ascribed to Macaber and Hans Holbein«, 1833, page 119

Douce doesn't seem to have noticed that the letter-press for the Escutcheon of Death (see picture on this page) was stolen from him.

Hans Ferdinand Massmann »Literatur der Todtentänze«, page 45
Jacques-Charles Brunet, »Manuel du libraire et de l'amateur de livres«, page 258
Eustache-Hyacinthe Langlois, »Essai historique, philosophique et pittoresque sur les danses des morts«, page 124.
Aldred Scott Warthin »The Doctor of the Dance of Death«, 1931, page 82-83.

Up to Holbein's great dance of death