Did von Melle say that half the painting was missing?
The painting in Lübeck was replaced by a new one in 1701, and
Jacob von Melle wrote down the old text.
Jacob von Melle is our only witness to the old painting, so we should weigh his words carefully.
He starts by quoting 4 lines from Death's prologue:
Der Tod sagt in der Vorrede:
"To dessem Dansse rope ik alghemene
"Pawest, Keiser, unde alle Creaturen
"Arme, Rike, grote unde klene,
"Tredet vort, wente nu en helpet nen truren.
|
Then von Melle goes on to say,
»Here between, a large piece is missing and almost half the dialogue.
Thereupon Death speaks to the canon […]«(1)
Jacob von Melle's epitaph.
|
Based on this, Heise postulates that half the painting was missing (because it had been sold to Tallinn).
This conclusion is devoid of any logic.
- Jakob von Melle had just quoted 4 lines from the beginning of the painting.
The very piece of the painting that according to Heise should have been in Tallinn.
This fact alone utterly explodes Heise's hypothesis.
- The same thing is true for the end of the row: After the canon, von Melle quotes the text for
Carthusian and burgomaster. Jakob von Melle had shuffled the sequence of
dancers (see the page about Jacob von Melle and the
notes
here
and
here)
- but regardless of the order it remains a fact that von Melle has described two persons
who - according to Heise - should have been in Tallinn.
- Jacob von Melle started his account by telling:
»There used to be old Low Saxon rhymes below, which
partly were rather obliterated and partly
- because of the many restorations - were very mangled.«(2)
If Jacob von Melle says the letters where obliterated and mangled, it follows logically → that there must have been a painting to observe.
- Heise "forgets" that after the replacement, von Melle wrote:
»The pictures now look exactly as they were designed earlier«.(3)
He didn't write
»Gee, it's good to have some art on the wall after having stared at a blank wall for 113 years!«.
So all in all, Jacob von Melle never said
that half the painting was missing in 1701. Quite on the contrary.
Heise's next witness: Gotthard von Hansen
In this section
Footnotes:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Jacob von Melle: »Hier zwischen fehlet ein grosses
Stück und fast die Helffte der Zusammen-Sprache; darauf sagt
der Tod zu dem Thum-Herrn […]«.
Jacob von Melle: »Es stunden ehmals alte Nieder-Sächsische Reimen darunter,
welche theils ziemlich verloschen, theils auch wegen der
offtmaligen renovation, sehr zustümmelt waren«.
Jakob von Melle: »Die Bilder sehen jetzo annoch eben so aus, wie sie vordem
gestalt gewesent«.
Dansk
Dances of death
Lübeck
Tallinn
A fragment?
Part 1