See comments below.
Click the small pictures to see the original pages.
Baethckes transskription XXVII. DE CANONNIK. XXVIII. DE DOT. |
We're getting a lot of concrete information about the canon:(1)
|
Myne prouene hebbe ik ok noch nicht lange ghehath Se is wol veerteynhundert gulden wert Ock hebbe ik dar wol drehundert dockaten na vortert Myt dem dat ik vorschenckede in den hof to rome Er ik wart gheheten eyn canonnick in vnsem dome Tovoren wart ick tho kollen in dem rechte eyn baccalarius Dar na tho lubeck eyn rike vicarius. Hadde ik myn dinck recht darna gevlegen Ik hadde noch twe vette prouene ghekregen. Dar to eyne gracien myt guder probenden Dyt stund altohope to mynen henden Nu byn ik erst to state ghekomen Vnde vor eynen prelaten vp ghenomen Bysschop to werden dat mochte my ock noch wol bescheen: Wolde de doet noch lenger hebben myt my ouerseen |
I have not had my benefice(2) for long it's probably worth 1,400 guilders. I have also paid 300 ducats [for the post], besides what I gave at the court in Rome, before I was called a canon in our cathedral. Before that, in Cologne I became a student(3) in law, thereupon [I became] a rich vicarius(4) in Lübeck. Had I then done right, I would have received two more fat, benefices, and furthermore a sideline with good prebends.(5) All this stood to my disposal. Now I have just obtained rank and have become a prelate.(6) To become Bishop - that might also happen to me, would Death still longer fail to see me. |
So our very ambitious canon has just bought(!) his posts, he has studied law in Cologne and had planned to become a bishop.
It has long been suggested that the text should describe a real-life person. Therefore Hartmut Freytag has investigated the facts a bit closer and has written the article »Meint der Lübecker Totentanz von 1489 (1496) einen historischen Domherrn?« in Zeitschrift des Vereins für Lübeckische Geschichte und Altertumskunde 68, 1988, pp 215-224.
In the period between 1450 and 1489 a total of 7 Lübeckians graduated from law school at the university in Cologne. A few of these can be shown not to be our canon - but for the rest there is not enough data. Therefore the theory can neither be confirmed nor disproved.
Footnotes: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)